From 164ace71f8282db18ac4c167724596c5449a307d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laurent Bercot
+ The s6- prefix is slightly misleading, and probably a naming +mistake. This package is not, stricto sensu, a part of the +s6 ecosystem, and it is nowhere near a requirement for a +s6-based installation. +However, it provides useful networking utilities often used with s6, +so keeping the prefix makes some kind of sense; you can see s6-networking, +as well as its dependency s6-dns, +as extensions to the s6 ecosystem. +
+